2010’s great movies thus far. All three of them.

A few months ago, my friend Brent sent me the following email: “Is Robin Hood worth watching for a guy who doesn’t go to many movies?” It was his last phrase that forced me to remind myself of a simple fact: Not everyone is obsessed with movies. Not everyone sees over 100 movies per year. Not everyone considers movies to be among the five most important things in his life, along with his family, his softball team, his PlayStation 3, and Kyle Singler.

So when people ask me whether or not I recommend a certain film, I need to recognize that many people demand excellence from movies in a way that I don’t. Don’t get me wrong, I have high standards for movies – it’s just that, because they’re my preferred method of existence, I can feel satisfied after watching a perfectly decent one as opposed to a truly great one. But if I’m going to recommend a film to someone like Brent – someone who simply doesn’t watch that many movies – then it needs to pass a certain threshold. Read More

Get your subtitles on: Foreign films you need to see

When we were growing up, my sister refused to watch foreign movies. I can’t recall her precise rationale for this, although given how childish we both were at the time, I’m not sure our reasoning processes could have been deemed to have anything resembling a “rationale”. I think she complained about having to read the subtitles, which didn’t make much sense given that she was perfectly literate. Regardless, whenever my father suggested watching a foreign movie, he was met with extreme disdain, not to mention occasional wailing.

Nowadays, armed with the power of a Netflix account, my sister probably watches 5-6 foreign movies each month. This victory over her earlier cinematic xenophobia can largely be attributed simply to growing up, but I’ll tentatively argue that it’s symptomatic of our country’s maturation toward foreign movies as a whole. Over the past decade, films like Amelie, City of God, and Pan’s Labyrinth have gained prominence not just abroad but within American cultural circles (all three earned major nominations at the Oscars, not just for Best Foreign Language Film). As a national collective, our moviegoing tastes have ever-so-gradually expanded, and subtitled pictures lack the stigma they once possessed. Read More

The Top 10 Movies of 2009

Before getting to the best films of 2009, a quick recap of my Oscar performance. (Yeah, from four months ago. I’ve been busy. Or lazy. Whatever.) Of the 21 categories I predicted, I hit correctly on 17 of them, or 81%. That’s my high-water mark since 2003 (when The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring was such a juggernaut that it could have turned Grady Little into Nostradamus), so I’m reasonably pleased overall. I’m disappointed that I missed on Best Original Screenplay, where Best Picture winner The Hurt Locker held off Tarantino’s edgier script for Inglourious Basterds, and I’m shocked – shocked – that Precious defeated Up in the Air for Best Adapted Screenplay. But otherwise, it’s hard to complain about shooting over 80%. For what it’s worth, I’m completely confident that my success rate will dip dramatically in 2010.

O.K., on to everyone’s favorite feature, my Top 10 list for the year in film. Looking back on the year at the movies as a whole, I have to regard it with a sense of apathy that’s becoming alarmingly familiar. I saw 88 different movies in the theatre in 2009, and very few of them generated true enthusiasm from me. Don’t get me wrong, I liked a considerable number of the films that I watched. That’s normal for me – if I didn’t like most movies I watched, I wouldn’t watch so many. But I don’t want to like movies. I want to love them. And whether it’s a result of a shift in my personal ideology (could my taste as a critic actually be maturing? I doubt it) or a decline in the quality of both studio and art-house fare (a more disturbing theory), I’m having a hard time loving movies these days. The simple truth is that, while I’m frequently content with what I see, I’m far less likely to actively stump for the vast majority of it. And that’s a shame, because I want other people to see movies. They’re my primary passion in life, and if people stop seeing them, then during conversation I’ll be forced to resort to riffing about the majesty of Jon Lester’s cut fastball in order to keep myself entertained. Read More

Oscars Analysis 2009: Director; Picture; Prediction roundup

This is it. For the convenience of my devoted readership who may or may not have skipped my prior analysis, I’m including a summary of all of my predictions at the end of this post. Now let’s get to the two most important awards of the night.

BEST DIRECTOR
Kathryn Bigelow – The Hurt Locker
James Cameron – Avatar
Lee Daniels – Precious
Jason Reitman – Up in the Air
Quentin Tarantino – Inglourious Basterds Read More

Oscars Analysis 2009: The Acting Categories

Want suspense? Look somewhere else. It’s a shame, but of the four acting categories in this year’s Oscar race, three are completely sewn up, while the fourth is hardly a tossup. And while this means I can comfortably pad my prediction stats, it sadly removes any element of intrigue from what are usually among the ceremony’s most intriguing races.

But such is life. Besides, given the sudden drama developing in the Best Picture race (more on that in my next post), it’s rather soothing to be on such firm footing. Let’s get to it.

BEST ACTOR
Jeff Bridges – Crazy Heart
George Clooney – Up in the Air
Colin Firth – A Single Man
Morgan Freeman – Invictus
Jeremy Renner – The Hurt Locker Read More