Project Hail Mary review: Galaxy Stressed

Ryan Gosling in Project Hail Mary

The novelist Andy Weir specializes in “hard” science-fiction, embroidering his stories with mathematical precision and analytic rigor. He’s a best-selling author whom you might also call a serious writer. The filmmakers Phil Lord and Christopher Miller, by contrast, have built their success on silliness, making droll animated yarns (Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs, The LEGO Movie) and the spoofy Jump Street pictures. They seem unlikely candidates to translate Weir’s brainy acumen to the screen. But while Project Hail Mary, which Lord and Miller have adapted from Weir’s 2021 book (via a screenplay by Drew Goddard), may be a blend of durable genres—part space opera, part survival saga, part buddy comedy—it isn’t a jumble of tones. Instead, the directing duo has applied their quippy instincts with warmth and sincerity, resulting in a crowd-pleasing movie that’s both playful and earnest. Call it hardy har har sci-fi.

This doesn’t mean Project Hail Mary is a model of discipline. It’s long, sappy, and choppy, with set pieces that are more intriguing than eye-popping. But it’s nonetheless coherent, and its humor works in tandem with both its muscular ambition and its abiding sweetness. Read More

Oscars 2025: Sinners and Winners

Autumn Durald Arkapaw accepting her Oscar for Sinners

The Oscars don’t matter. But the movies do.

That was the real takeaway of the 98th Academy Awards, an uneven ceremony that venerated some very good motion pictures. As a matter of celebratory choreography—as, y’know, an awards show—it was awfully bumpy. With the exception of Will Arnett and Channing Tatum, most of the paired presenters were dreadfully stiff, while the producers—perhaps traumatized by lingering memories of Adrien Brody a year ago—were unduly hasty in playing the winners off stage, especially for the below-the-line fields. The sound mix was clunky, some of the speeches felt obligatory, and a bunch of prearranged bits landed with a thud. It was far from the smoothest commemoration of the power of cinema.

But these Oscars were still, on the whole, a good time, in part because the movies they feted were so satisfying. It didn’t hurt that Conan O’Brien, in his second straight stint as host, was locked in from the jump, with an ingenious introduction—repurposing the rousing climax of Weapons into a rapid-fire tour through many of the nominated films—that led into a note-perfect monologue. O’Brien obviously knows how to work a crowd, but here he located just the right blend of good-natured sarcasm, political snark, and sincere admiration. He also delivered some pointed jabs about the industry’s future—roasting Netflix’s Ted Sarandos, castigating phone-cropped atrocities, teaming with Sterling K. Brown to mock the clumsy storytelling habits of the streaming era—without spoiling anyone’s fun. Read More

Oscars 2025: Full List of Predictions

Timothee Chalamet in Marty Supreme

Hey, were you desperately hoping for an easily digestible list of all of my predictions and preferences for the 21 feature categories at this year’s Oscars, but frustrated that you had to read a bunch of different pieces to find them? You’re in luck!

Note that I’m pegging One Battle After Another and Sinners to win five and four total awards, respectively. Both of those numbers could be either too high or too low, and the particular division between them is also up in the air. This is cool! Here’s to an unpredictable Oscars. (Categories arranged alphabetically; click on the header links for more detailed analysis.)

Best Actor
Will win: Timothée Chalamet—Marty Supreme (confidence: 1/5)
Should win: Leonardo DiCaprio—One Battle After Another
Worst omission: Robert Pattinson—Mickey 17 Read More

Oscars 2025: Best Picture and Best Director

Chase Infiniti in One Battle After Another; Michael B. Jordan in Sinners

And at last, we’ve arrived at the top dogs. If you’ve missed our prior analysis of all feature categories at this year’s Oscars, you can find specific breakdowns at the following links:

Best Actress and Best Actor
The screenplays
Best Supporting Actor and Supporting Actress
The big techies
The odds and ends

BEST DIRECTOR

NOMINEES
Chloé Zhao—Hamnet
Josh Safdie—Marty Supreme
Paul Thomas Anderson—One Battle After Another
Joachim Trier—Sentimental Value
Ryan Coogler—Sinners

WILL WIN
Anderson. You can try to make a case for Coogler, especially if you think Sinners is winning Best Picture. But Anderson has swept the precursors, and even if Sinners pulls the upset in the top prize, the Academy has split its two biggest awards plenty of times in the recent past (though not since 2021, when CODA won Best Picture but Jane Campion won for directing The Power of the Dog). There’s no point predicting anyone else. Read More

Oscars 2025: Best Actress and Best Actor

Rose Byrne in If I Had Legs I'd Kick You; Ethan Hawke in Blue Moon

We’re saving the nominal top prizes (Best Picture and Best Director) for tomorrow, but frankly, these are always my two favorite Oscar categories to analyze. Not because they’re competitive—though one of this year’s races is downright tantalizing in its plausible outcomes—but because the pool of acting talent in contemporary cinema is incredibly deep, and it’s always rewarding (if challenging) to whittle the list of contenders down to my personal favorites. I routinely argue that the word “snub” has no proper place in movie-award discourse, and the Best Actor and Best Actress races most plainly illustrate why.

BEST ACTRESS

NOMINEES
Jessie Buckley—Hamnet
Rose Byrne—If I Had Legs I’d Kick You
Kate Hudson—Song Sung Blue
Renate Reinsve—Sentimental Value
Emma Stone—Bugonia

WILL WIN
Right, so remember what I was saying about one of this year’s lead acting categories being extremely competitive? It’s the other one. Buckley has swept all of the precursor awards, she gets to articulate virulent grief, and she heads a Best Picture nominee. Unless you’re gambling with someone else’s money, there’s no reason to bet on anyone else. Read More